Liars, Cheats, Thieves and Whores -- and they Ain't necessarily Alcholics!

Perhaps these observations will provide a bit of assistance in why I do not believe our one-party system works(and the truth of the matter is, it is one party of Liars, Cheats, Thiefs and Whores).

Beginning of Rant!

Look at the DNC and what they are doing to try to get and maintain 60 votes and we are not even at a time when we could vote for a bill -- the bill that doesn't provide health care but begins and starts up another God Damned entitlement -- no one could possibly understand -- except it is CRAP!.

Whether there is a hobgoblin messing with the mechanism, a hidden conspiracy or not, it is time to wake the hell up, America!


It doesn't make any difference to me -- What is going on is occurring because we give a stamp of approval for our politicians of both of these parties to do what they are going to do. BY VOTOING FOR THE SORRY BASTARDS!

Case in point: There are indeed Conservative Republicans. Ronald Reagan, the only conservative that ever ran for office in my lifetime is a tremendous example. He had vision, he communicated well and essentially, within the modern framework, attempted to reign in Government and was successful. Taxes were cut. The so called "revolution" worked for a time. The GOP gained the Senate, House and promptly lost the oval office -- by running a standard, progressive candidate for the Presidency.

Case in point: Lindsay Graham -- This gentleman is well spoken, but he is not a conservative. I like him, his demeanor, etc. But he is no different than any of the Republicans who ran and held office after FDR was elected -- all the way up to the what began occurring during Reagan's second term in office. From 1934 until 1994, 60 years, The DNC, the unions, liberals, socialists and statists, controlled the legislative body of our government, it's agenda, it's programs(entitlements), and the morale and ethical tone of the nation.

Of course, we had long ago given up being a Republic -- by instituting so-called Constitutional amendments. We instituted the primary system that fueled the socialist state -- the 16th amendment. After all, what could it hurt? It would only be a maximum of 7% tax rate, that's what they said during the congressional hearings on the 16th Amendment, they said, and only on "true income".

NOW LOOK WHAT WE HAVE DONE!

And it is: We.

WE ELECTED THEM!

There were many other institutions created -- The FED, a central US Bank, integral to the apparent plans of the Keynesian internationalist economy. I can think of many more but in 1789, the very year of ratification of the Constitution, the battle related to a Central US Bank began and has been an ongoing saga since that time.

I have never and will never vote for a democrat. It took too long to dismantle the infrastructure created by FDRs statist machine -- when you elect a dog-catcher democrat, socialist, communist, progressive, you help them build the underlying infrastructure they will use to motivate voters to their cause -- and Cold Warrior's observation about precinct level activism in the Tea Party discourse is totally apropos...the Republican Rene Dubois version of think globally, act locally. Of course, in general, conservatives, republicans, and so-called conservative blue dog democrats don't think they are progressives. They feel they are doing their bit, busy out there working, building, and doing. Politics and volunteering is not their natural forte. But they keep buying the bit -- which means they buy the premise. That is the exact definition of what a socialist is! Progressive, go along and have government do it. Tax for this and tax for that. Need that land, well then take it. And so it goes.

I have witnessed in the person of my grandfather, my father, and now a voting history of 50 years of my own, year after year after year, supporting the GOP. We three, have never, across three generations, voted for a democrat. But what did we get?

DEMOCRAT LIGHT! - with a HEAVY TINGE OF STATIST FASCISM!

But, most of the time, as my father observed back in the 1960s and his father before him(in the 40s and 50s), he was, he said: "voting for the lesser of two evils."

How true.

Because, aside from Reagan, I have generally been unable to cast my vote for someone -- rather, I have cast my vote in opposition to the left -- and they have controlled, and are "building the crescendo" under which we will all live in a state of Tyranny -- it is here, that statist police, behavioral controlling Big Brother.

I recall discussing this with my father and uncle in the late 1970s, saying we need not fear 1984 the Fiction, rather, we need fear and prepare against the fact. Homeland security is turned inward on our borders and the ability to defend oneself against the incursion of illegal hoards is severely limited. I have witnessed this border patrol nonsense far from the border crossing points. Due to our "liberal" laws, we do not enforce the very drawn lines which define us -- geographic boundary. Is it any wonder we watch while an idiot boards a plane with a bomb he intended to detonate, when we don't allow profiling to be the basis for which we examine serious intent by these immoral cretins? Instead, the BP and Homeland Security is aligned in a politically expedient manner and we have congress pondering how to be polite enough and firm enough at the same time.

There are too many things to note that are characteristic of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result each time the action is taken. No. I won't vote for a Republican. It won't wash any longer. Voting for the lesser of two evils doesn't work. Voting for a progressive, which is what most Republican's appear to be, is speeding toward the all powerful "state" at the speed of a train instead of the rocket--or, if it is wrong, it is speeding in the direction of that wrong at less speed than the far left but they will eventually arrive at the same place.

Instead, I will vote for a candidate who will uphold the Constitution as originally intended -- all institutions aside. And here, I can paraphrase Paul Bondi in the book, The Brave Cowboy, speaking to Jack Burns in a jail house in New Mexico -- I will never betray a friend for the sake of a law. I will never betray a friend for the sake of an institution. Great nations may fall in ruin before I fail to live by this design.

And so I will arrive finally at the underlying theme of my comments -- I will no longer cast a vote for a Republican or volunteer my permission for them to do what they will do -- because they do not have 1787 and it's principles embodied in their platform -- the central focus of their belief is not a Constitutional Republic at all. They do not deserve my support. The GOP's tenants are not mine, and the men and women who run for office do not represent the ideals of the founders -- okay, old dead white men had done what needed doing, established it and we have *#*#'ed it up.

Every damned time I turn around, someone wants additional tax revenue. Now the Political left(Democrats, socialists, communists, greenies, etc), want to put the IRS in charge of ensuring that all citizens are forced to pay for socialized medicine. Just what we need -- Added Gestapo Powers given to the Gestapo arm of the Socialist State -- It is the engine which fuels the whole socialist/progressive/Statist, behavioral controlling state -- This idea of course, given and implemented for our welfare -- here in the US we have a tax system proposed by none other than
Karl Marx and Friedrick Engles themseves -- 1848!

So let's take a look at what is going on in this country since 1913:

We have implmented, HERE!, In the United States, Plank 2 of the communist party manifesto - IT is through this mechanism that Plank 1 is implemented. If they can take it, you don't own it. What are the first two planks?

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax
elf - a graduated income tax being a component of the Communist Manifesto!

The planks of the manifesto have an intent and it is identified prior to the listing of the planks, or platform and idealogy of the Communists:

When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organize itself as a class, if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.

It sounds like they intend a revolution on paper first, in law second, and in actuality third, if necessary. When has it never not been necessary?

The document then goes on to address the basis of the planks themselves: abolition land and property ownership, inheritance rights eliminated(sound familiar here in Amerika?); Progressive Income tax (just exactly what do you think title 26, USC really is?); elimination of private transportationand centralized Government ownership and control of transportation(Sound's Green to me!); Control of the media(Sounds like a DNC Plan, and it is!); The implmentation of ownership by the state or conotrol of the means of production(Industry and business).

Who are these revolutionaries battling against? Well obviously, those who earn a higher income than others, those who own the property and own the means of production, the businesses and this would mean-- OH YOU DIDN'T SEE THIS? HEALTH CARE! Health Care is 1/7th of the total US Economy. They state who their enemy is -- in 19th century terms but it is truly most Americans when you consider the state of the 3rd world and the socialist/communists states around the world. They say it terms of the struggle between capitalism and the owners, the ruling class or the bourgoise.
I don't own a business. But I want the right to do so. I don't own the means of product, but I want the right to have it if I can get it. Even if I am a wage earner, I have a better chance at a good lifestyle than anywhere else in the world.

I don't know about you but I do not buy their socialist crap and it's about time the rest of you "wake the hell up!"

We must KNOW the boundaries of 1789 and live by them, and if we aren't willing to die for them, we will "hang separately, in our estrangement from our fellow patriots."


TWO PARTY SYSTEM, MY ASS!

what was then a "miracle at Philadelphia" is now gone awry-- run by politico's, liars, cheats, thieves, and whores in cahoots with Bankers, Lawyers, sheriffs and the bottom-dwelling scum-suckers behind it all--all are sorry bastards, stealing us blind.

My rejoinder to thinking that the Tea Party should focus on party politics is framed in my above personal reference but embodied in a rejection of behavior control laws -- siezure of private property, the formation of an internal state police force(HOMELAND SECURITY), the instrument of siezure of funds and other internal policing -- The Gestapo - The IRS.

End of Rant!